 |
|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 390 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2019 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Shifty :Redscat:Khlav Kalash:
Massive game now, will go a long way to deciding who makes the six. Must be better than that second half today. To be honest it was the most disappointing hadl so far. Collectively as team we seamed to lose the plot.
Anyhow we perform as we have been doing up until that point and we have a chance, and we owe them one for earlier in the season.
I agree, a very disappointing second half after a first half master class, Too many knock-ons and a total lack of attacking ideas in that twenty minute spell in their twenty metres area. i don't think it was a total lack of attacking ideas because we should have scored at least 3 or 4 tries, if we'd have just passed the ball properly, there was that one with Walmsley when he threw a forward to Rourke, when he should have let it go earlier, there was one i where I think Jowitt threw it to Walmsley but he put too much on it & it went into touch. Tbh, without watching it back, I lost count of the number of tries we butchered, there were just too many. I remember Hood went for a quick pick-up a couple of meters out, to dive over after a good run from Hall, and knocked on when the line was wide open. So many times where we were in their 20 and just made mistakes we just didn't make in the first half, and we should have put another 30 points on them imo. We dominated the game and territory, but we went away from playing the structures we trained and executed in that first half and went looking for that miracle pass a few too many times, plus started making silly erors, and we also let Catalans make us get into a bit of an ugly game for a bit. Seems to happen quite often when teams get so on top in the first half, they just can't keep the standards the same the whole 80, and the scoreboard seems to affect how they play. Still, we nearly put 50 on Catalans, a team we've usually had trouble with, so we can't grumble too much. We got the 2 points, and our points difference is healthy. That second half, though, leaving to one side the tries we should have scored, etc, seemed to last forever, and had too many drawn-out stoppages. Those Captains' challenges do nothing for the game in their current form, and the amount of time it took the video ref to decide on fairly straightforward things like TJ's last try just sapped the life out of the game. The second half must have lasted 10 minutes longer than the first. Anyway, with that same team and play how we did for 60 minutes or so, we should do just fine. As I said, I think the drop off was a symptom of going for miracle passes and not playing to structure because we were scoring so easily, knock that on the head and hopefully we can have a little winning streak going in the next few games. Agree - if Corey could look up a bit more instead of going for the line we would have scored a few more. Also I thought Walmsley could have taken Tomkins on the outside instead of throwing the forward to Hall, with a little more confidence - I recall Tomkins was done on the outside last week and it really exposed his advancing years.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 146 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| BarnsleyGull:
Lets be honest here, the worst 40 minutes of the season so far, which is a shame with the quality of rugby we have been playing. In the cold light of day, a game we should have won, but didn't. (Cas should have beat us so we got that one) Players out of position, dropping the ball, soft pens and TJ missing cost us the game. Move on to Shudds and put it right. Up the Trin!
All academic really as I see it, as you say the worst 40 mins imaginable not helped by the referee on our part although I'm sure he reffed it properly in his mind and if the last try had been disallowed we were in no condition to go upfield for a golden point, as you say on to shudds for a bit of redemption.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2889 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just watched last Hull try and how he could have Sent it up as a try is baffling.If it had gone up as a no try it would not have been given You could not see the ball .Any body understand what happened with the vido challenge in the second half .I through it was our ball but the ref gave them a free kick..Not blaming ref for a very poor display ,But shows what damage a 50 /50 call can do
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4826 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| alegend:
Just watched last Hull try and how he could have Sent it up as a try is baffling.If it had gone up as a no try it would not have been given You could not see the ball .Any body understand what happened with the vido challenge in the second half .I through it was our ball but the ref gave them a free kick..Not blaming ref for a very poor display ,But shows what damage a 50 /50 call can do
I think that Wakey challenged something, a call of a strip perhaps, which was overturned but in reviewing they spotted at high tackle so it was a successful challenge but still a penalty to Hull.That's just what I surmise happened but I was at the ground and haven't watched the game on TV so I may well be wrong.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 7685 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| scarrie:alegend:
Just watched last Hull try and how he could have Sent it up as a try is baffling.If it had gone up as a no try it would not have been given You could not see the ball .Any body understand what happened with the vido challenge in the second half .I through it was our ball but the ref gave them a free kick..Not blaming ref for a very poor display ,But shows what damage a 50 /50 call can do
I think that Wakey challenged something, a call of a strip perhaps, which was overturned but in reviewing they spotted at high tackle so it was a successful challenge but still a penalty to Hull.That's just what I surmise happened but I was at the ground and haven't watched the game on TV so I may well be wrong. If your on about Walmsley. Yes, the ref got the stripping penalty wrong. But Walmsley didn’t hit high I didn’t think. He didn’t hit the chin or head at all and his hand got players shoulder. If I recall the Hull crowd appeared to win that one. Much like the Cust one, that wasn’t high either. You see many arms round shoulders and across collar bone area etc as just regular tackles game in game out. If they were both high and there’s consistency we are back to that silly season where we were seeing countless high penalties last season that quickly got binned off. The thing that irks me is when an actual arm to side of face hits Rourke and the VR says clearly there’s head contact. He then says he got shoulder too so it’s ‘incidental’ and waves play on… I thought head contact with an arm was a straight penalty regardless. We saw what appeared imo the rules applied differently in the same game. Shouldn’t happen imo.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2889 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| scarrie:alegend:
Just watched last Hull try and how he could have Sent it up as a try is baffling.If it had gone up as a no try it would not have been given You could not see the ball .Any body understand what happened with the vido challenge in the second half .I through it was our ball but the ref gave them a free kick..Not blaming ref for a very poor display ,But shows what damage a 50 /50 call can do
I think that Wakey challenged something, a call of a strip perhaps, which was overturned but in reviewing they spotted at high tackle so it was a successful challenge but still a penalty to Hull.That's just what I surmise happened but I was at the ground and haven't watched the game on TV so I may well be wrong. I was at the game as well ,enjoyed having the choice to stand up,but was nice to sit in the seat when I needed a rest With all the rails been on every row of seats made it a lot better for a old grumpy man like me to climb the steps to get the top . Got to give the fans credit they made plenty of noise .Were as the idea of taking of one shoe and waving it in the air come from .Got to admit enjoyed the night not disappointed at least we were in the game.Did sneak out with 2 minutes left ,no queuing in the car park got back home in about 45 mins
| | |
 | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
---|
19.67M | 1,551 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
|