Tom's try was definitely off side. 


Lino's is down to interpretation but I'd have been upset if it was the other way round and not given to us.

Lino's try on top of the two disallowed for offside was a sickener . I reckon he would have scored the try anyway. And then to rule out the last for the only forward pass he saw in the game was hard to take.
All that on top of the juggling try of Hulls!
Can somebody explain to.me please what constitues a knock on nowadays because I'm as baffled as the referees seem to be.
To say Hull got the rub of the green is a complete understatement. 

Live I thought Ese'ese collected it, the replay looked like it hit Hood, but it was given as a try so it was always going to stand. Much like Johnstone and Lino, had they gone up as trys they would've ilkley been given. Fine margins, and at some point we'll be on the right side of them.  

Interesting, " a player must keep control & possession of the ball, it is down to him to secure the ball when in possession"
If thee ball separates control is deemed as lost even if he regathers before it hits the floor especially if the ball moves forward.
This also applies in field or if over the line !!!
This happened/occured by hull upon their first try - - No doubt about it , however if the ref rules different acting against the rules then that's the dispute, refs can never be held of bringing the game into disrepute !!!
Coupled to these points, if losing the ball in that fashion, then a player should be enabled to toss the ball in the air above players head & then move around defenders catch the ball move forward & score ! Weirdly according to this ref !
Note that in the saints match a player headed the ball forward & scored which was given, & is against the rules, 
All down to the referee again !!

Further point at issue, the last try of hulls was a try to me, however, the scorer was on side, the centre was in front of the kicker, 
He then was inside the 10m zone, frf never went to the video, that does not bother me, only inconsistency which can be interpreted as a bias etc lack of transparency !